9/12-9/13

In class yesterday and today, we have been exploring representation at the Convention of 1787. The main issues discussed were bicameralism, methods of election, and rules about the right of the people to vote. In a group, I read a primary source document about the debate between equal representation for the states, or proportional representation based on population. Some delegates argued that equal representation was best, because smaller states needed to have a say in government. Others argued that proportional representation was better because it represented a majority of people and their interests. I found it interesting that some people did not believe in proportional representation. Maybe it reminded them of living under a monarch, because the most powerful states could dominate the government.

            Today, the first portion of class was spent on a quiz on the Preamble to the Constitution, which was created at the same convention. Afterwards, groups combined to share notes on the other decisions made. Bicameralism, the principle of having two houses of legislature, was only supported by some at the Convention. Many delegates wanted to add power to Congress later since the current system was working, while others wanted to spread the power. Another group shared notes about the right of people to elect representatives. Though it is important for the general public to share their ideas about government and give support, I can understand why some opposed this concept. People today can easily still be misinformed. Advertising about candidates can imply false goals and portray other candidates negatively. To conclude the lesson, we took notes on the final product: the Connecticut Compromise. This resulted in a Congress with two houses (the Senate and House of Representatives), one state-elected and one citizen-elected, and one with equal representation and the other proportional. The Convention of 1787 and Connecticut Compromise have contributed greatly to our government, and our daily lives.